Q Acoustics 3000 5.1 Speaker System Review

3000 5.1 Speaker System
Build Quality

3070 Subwoofer
Build Quality
PRICE $900

Sweet and smooth sats
Dual 6.5-inch sub
Deep sub juts out from wall

A sweet-sounding system, with a sub worthy of the satellites, the Q Acoustics 3000 is one of the best under-$1,000 5.1-channel setups I’ve heard.

Tube amps. Mono pressings. And now, 5.1? Has bedrock surround sound indeed joined the ranks of retro audio technologies? Surround receivers beyond the most entry level nearly always have more than five channels (though their uses vary), while Dolby Atmos and DTS:X have made seven (5.1.2) the new minimum system configuration. What happens when you go in the other direction? The flood of 5.1 speaker sets that I used to review in the late 20th and early 21st centuries has tapered to a trickle. I see fewer new ones at CES and CEDIA, and plain old stereo is dominant at the rest of the domestic and international audio shows. However, the British manufacturer Q Acoustics has been marketing 5.1-channel speaker sets since the company’s inception about a decade ago and continues to actively develop them. The brand’s latest entry is called the 3000 5.1 Home Theatre System.

The founders of Q Acoustics previously worked for some fabled British loudspeaker makers, such as KEF, Mission, and Tannoy. The 3000 is one of four Q Acoustics 5.1-channel systems and one of two to be sold in the United States (through Q’s American website or Amazon, among others, with free shipping). The other three systems are the satellite-based 7000i Plus 5.1, also sold in the U.S.; the towerbased Concept Cinema; and the 2000i Cinema, which uses compact speakers with 5-inch woofers, as opposed to the 4-inchers in the 3000. The company also sells soundbars, as well as in-wall, in-ceiling, and outdoor speakers.


The 3000 system consists of four 3010 compact satellites, a 3090C center, and a 3070S subwoofer. (The individual models are priced at $200/pair, $180, and $400, respectively, which would total $980—but when you buy them together as the 3000 package, you get an $80 discount.) In pictures, these speakers look plain to the point of anonymity. Up close and personal, though, the matte graphite gray vinyl enclosures that housed my samples have a pleasing fit and finish, and the rigorous lack of ornamentation—aside from a slightly paler gray band around the baffle—makes them easy to live with. Optional accessories include the 3000ST stand ($140/pair) and 3000WB wall bracket ($28/each). The speakers do not have keyhole mounts, though there is a threaded insert on the bottom. The sub’s supplied spikes may be made safe for hardwood floors with the included rubber covers.

The 3010 satellite is a twoway design with a 1-inch coated polyester-weave soft dome tweeter (with radiating surround) and a 4-inch paper-aramid (similar to Kevlar) cone woofer, behind a magnetically attached cloth grille. The 3090C center flanks the tweeter with two of the woofers. Both models have plastic-nut binding posts that are staggered at a right angle; inflexible speaker cables with short leads would not be ideal mates. Both have a nominal impedance of 6 ohms. Rated sensitivity is 86 decibels for the satellite, about average for an affordable compact sat, and 89 dB for the center. A decent budget receiver should run them fine, but a beefier one would run them even better. (To some degree, you could say that about most speakers.)


The subwoofer in an under-$1,000 speaker package is typically the weakest family member. It is here that Q breaks from the pack with what looks like a giant monitor offering two 6.5-inch drivers in a 21-inch-deep rear-ported enclosure. Small drivers, big enclosure. With that cabinet depth, this isn’t a wall hugger, though it might sit alongside a credenza just fine. Amplification is rated at a respectable 140 watts RMS. The company chose not to inflate the number with a peak power rating, even an alternative one.

Associated equipment included a Denon AVR-X7200W A/V receiver, Oppo BDP-83SE universal disc player, Micro Seiki BL-51 turntable, Shure M97xE cartridge, Denon PRA-S10 serving as phono preamp, Lenovo Windows 10 laptop, and Moon by Simaudio Neo 230HAD DAC. All movie demos were on Blu-ray.

Dum Dada Dum
I try not to make snap judgments, but when this system uttered its first sound—the familiar fanfare of horns and snare drums that accompanies the 20th Century Fox logo on a movie disc—I immediately thought, “I like this!” Followed by, “That must be a soft dome tweeter,” though this was break-in listening, and I hadn’t pored over the specs yet. An openness at the top of the presence region let me know the tweeter wasn’t sounding unduly soft.

Q Acoustics
(855) 279-5070

utopianemo's picture

Mark, how would you say these compare to the RSL or Wharfedale systems you reviewed a while back? I know that's not a fair question to ask, both because of the distance of time and the sheer quantity of products that pass through your setup. I had been planning to get one of those, but this Q Acoustics system seems like it might prove a bit disruptive to the status quo.

Georgenef's picture

Surrogacy preparations are medically, emotionally, monetarily and legally sophisticated. For some men and women who earlier ended up not able to have kids, including gay couples and females who are unable to carry a pregnancy, surrogacy delivers the chance to have a youngster.

The info supplied below [url=https://markable.in/profiles/profile/38616/]https://markable.in/profiles... relates to surrogacy arrangements in Australia. If you are thinking about endeavor surrogacy elsewhere you may find the information offered on the our site beneficial.


Taking into consideration skilled strategy of our surrogacy agency, it is apparent why we can boast of large surrogacy accomplishment charge. Prior to selecting on a remedy, every affected person undergoes a total health-related examination, with an person remedy currently being chosen based on all healthcare take a look at benefits. The clinic hires only highly professional professionals, who often get skilled education to keep abreast with the latest technological advancements. On leading of that, large achievement charges are attained due to the contemporary equipment utilised in the clinic. Each device is analyzed and Fda accredited.

Surrogacy can be an amazingly satisfying encounter, both for intended mother and father and gestational carriers. Even so, it also requires substantial dedication from both get-togethers, and it is critical to consider all of the execs and cons of surrogacy before starting the approach.

Below you will uncover some of the most common surrogacy professionals and downsides for everyone associated in the procedure.

Stringent or opaque legislation of a lot of nations around the world and the high cost of surrogacy services drive partners to look for surrogate moms exterior their personal nation. Ukraine is considered the European center of the reproductive tourism. Ukrainian laws is faithful prices on surrogacy in Ukraine are affordable, and the level of medication is at a higher degree. No surprise that several couples head to Ukraine in lookup of a surrogate mom to give start to their little one.

Ukraine is one particular of the couple of international locations in the entire world exactly where the use of the vast majority of reproductive systems, in certain surrogate motherhood and egg donation, is fully authorized. In this regard, Ukrainian lawmakers have been considerably a lot more progressive than most of their European counterparts. What’s much more, equally altruistic and business surrogacy Ukraine are authorized by legislation.

If you are looking for the worldwide surrogacy agency with the large level of parental legal rights defense, superior healthcare expectations, and individual approach to each consumer, then Our Surrogacy Agency is the correct area for you. Large accomplishment surrogacy prices and entire health care, psychological, and authorized guidance throughout the complete process - these are some of the ironclad assures presented to all clients of the surrogacy company.

Also read:

angelman0401's picture

I'm also looking a purchase real soon on a 5.1 setup and have been considering RSL CG3 system based on the reviews I've read and after speaking with RSL on the phone. I would also like to know what a professional's opinion would be between the RSL CG3 or CG4, these Q Acoustics, and the Wharfedale system that was reviewed on this site last year. Thank you all for your opinions, advice, and great website.

roughtb123's picture

when giving performance ratings, is this in comparison to a specific price range. for example, how would you rate this vs. the Elac unfi bookshelf 5.1 system.

jdbond's picture

I also have a similar question to what was posted earlier. I am looking at the RSL CG4 5.1 system and would appreciate your feedback on how this compares to the Q Acoustics system reviewed here with one small change. I am considering the 3020 instead of the 3010 that comes with this package and would thus purchase individual components. I appreciate your opinion!!!