Arcam AVR360 A/V Receiver Page 2

In addition to the Paradigms, associated gear included an Oppo BDP-83 SE universal disc player, Rega Planar 25 turntable, Shure M97xE cartridge, and Bellari VP530 phono preamp. All movie selections were Blu-ray discs with DTS-HD Master Audio soundtracks.

Devils and Demons
The audiophile virtues were present in abundance. This receiver covered the frequency spectrum from low to medium to high in admirable (and highly listenable) proportions. Classical proportions, you might even say. I never felt there was anything lacking in bass down to the 80Hz crossover I typically use with my speakers. Midrange—I can never mention it too many times—was warm, liquid, and well-balanced, without that fatal hyping of the presence region that often makes me uncomfortable. High frequencies were also balanced, neither rolled off nor exaggerated. When the receiver reached into its power reserves for a dynamic challenge, it usually behaved well, with the result that I rarely resorted to the use of Dolby Volume to tame extremes of dynamics.

The Devil’s Double (Blu-ray, DTS-HD Master Audio) had an epic sweep, with Dominic Cooper playing both Saddam Hussein’s psychopathic son and his hapless body double. Confronted with complex, layered information—like a hushed orchestra waxing over bloody battle footage—the Arcam delivered the dramatic goods. Finding a master volume level that reconciled dialogue and effects was never a burden. I was able to make minimal decisions early on and stick with them throughout the movie.

Night of the Demons (Blu-ray, DTS-HD Master Audio) is a New Orleans–based, haunted-house story with the usual abrupt shock effects. This was the only selection that benefited from a dash of Dolby Volume, with its dynamic range compression operating at the lowest setting. The contrast with the previous and following selections showed how the Arcam dealt with cruder source material. As a high-resolution product, it didn’t entirely whitewash the truth. But clean amplification can make even a cheesy horror soundtrack less abrasive.

The Depression-era circus epic Water for Elephants utterly seduced me when it flowed out of the Arcam/Paradigm system. My notebook filled with slightly ephemeral high-end superlatives like flow and pacing. The soundfield was big and well-defined, suiting a life lived in tents and outdoors, and an interlude of rainfall felt realistic. Music was sweet and satisfying, even from an old Bessie Smith 78. This combination of content and hardware reminded me why I became a toy critic in the first place. It was pleasurable and moving.

Strings Don’t Lie
Stringed instruments—whether in an orchestra or chamber group—can quickly reveal the strengths and weaknesses of a system. To my ears, they’re as revealing as voices. The Arcam acted like a true music lover’s receiver with the Emerson String Quartet’s Sony Classical CD of Mozart’s Prussian Quartets. At the behest of the Prussian king, Mozart gave special attention to the cello parts, and the Arcam responded with a loving treatment of the instrument’s wooden body, loaded with almost holographically imaged resonance and beauty. There was detail but no overzealous etching. The instrument emerged as a full-bodied whole. It sang.

The Dave Brubeck Quartet’s Jazz Impressions of New York (on LP) has a typical 1960s mix with the leader’s piano at far right, Joe Morello’s swinging drums at far left, and Paul Desmond’s suave voice-like sax hovering in the middle along with the bass. The Arcam adeptly imaged the alto sax, revealing (but not hyping) the voice-like breathiness that humanized Desmond’s playing. It had no trouble getting rhythmic urgency out of the two percussion instruments.

The Beatles’ Revolver gets regular workouts in my procession of review systems, especially when I’m already in a good mood. I’m still playing the first-generation CD release. Even now, it’s still a revelation compared with the old, awful American vinyl. The Arcam did what a good amp always does for this album. Rather than tyrannically impose a uniform sound of its own, it emphasized the sonic individuality of each track, from the stinging lead guitar of “Taxman” to the pumping strings of “Eleanor Rigby” to the naturalistically miked acoustic guitars of “I’m Only Sleeping” to the complex, textured riot of “Tomorrow Never Knows.”

Though not cheap, the AVR360 sets a new standard of affordability for anyone hungering for the Arcam sound. If you want maximum features per buck, look elsewhere. If you want to power speakers with low sensitivity or efficiency ratings, the rail- switching AVR600 is a better bet. But with the right speakers, the AVR360 is just the ticket for the budget-minded audiophile seeking a receiver that celebrates musical and cinematic values.

[Editor’s Note: Prospective buyers should read four Video Test Bench report for the Arcam AVR360, which performed below our benchmarks for the deinterlacing of 1080i, film-based, 3:2 content in its conversion to 1080p output, and also clipped both below black and above white signals on HDMI with upscaling engaged. These flaws would not be visible on all content and would likely be missed by all but the most critical viewers. Video processing in the AVR360 can be set for passthrough, which bypasses the processing and allows the source or disply to perform the conversion while eliminating the clipping. Clipping is an error we see fairly frequently in AVRs, although often with less severity, but neither error should really appear in an $1,800 receiver, especially given today’s excellent third-party video processing solutions. The AVR360’s Top Pick designation is wholly based on the weight of its extraordinary audio performance, with the recognition that, for most users in practice, the video flaws would neither be obvious nor a dealbreaker. —Rob Sabin]

(866) 916-4667

mastermaybe's picture

sigh. Sorry, but this reeks of yet another canned "boutique" avr review.

You know the ones: generally AVR's priced at $2k+ (although this one's a bargain at $1800) that "feature" neutered connectivity, a scant number of (useful) features, handicapped useability/versatility and many times, poor to abysmal video processing ...all in the name of "better sound" and "real power".


First, a "real" 75-100 watts and and an "overstated" 120 are really non-starters when you understand that you need the twice the power for 3 decibels of output. Sorry, that's just irrefutable, empirical science.

So then, it's beyond silly to start touting one avr over another for a handful of "honest watts".

Now, this "better/improved sound". Describe it for me. Can it be discerned through an ABX?

At this point, good luck proving/finding differences between D/A chips and properly operating solid state amplifiers running below clipping. They simply do not exist and the vast majority of serious hobbyists know it.

All we're really left with are room correction/EQ systems and all of them (that I've heard, anyway) are excellent with only slight variances that most would be hard-pressed to note, never mind dish out gobs of extra coin for- especially in lieu of the aforementioned benefits that so many (99+%) purchase one for in the first place. Perhaps that's one of the reasons so many of these outfits are suffering so deeply or have disappeared altogether.

Go figure.

I truly wish these Arcams, NADs, Anthems, etc would be fairly judged against the Onkyo, Denons, and Yamahas of the AV world, but I realize it will never happen.

Like those praising the virtues of $10,000 speaker cable, there will always exist a faction within this hobby (although thankfully, most times, to much less foolish lengths) that will perpetually- albeit clandestinely- correlate a product's quality to not only its price tag, but worse, the "uniqueness" of its logo. And that's a real shame for the serious enthusiast, but worse still for the casual A/V joe six-pack who can easily be terribly misled by such nonsense.

double sigh.

smackbomb's picture

You must not come from an audiophile background. I can tell you this. I plugged in the Arcam in the bedroom, with terrible old speakers and a lame bluray player, and closed the cabinet. That night, I put on a show, and my wife looked up from her book and said "What did you do?" After a KEF living room upgrade, she has been very touchy about me spending money. In 30 seconds, my 'as far from audio quality conscious as you can get' wife realized that there was something different. Once she found out I got it used and at a deal too, she was less mad and readily admitted that it sounded loads better than a high end harman Kardon it replaced. The quality is there, you just have to experience it.